2026年07月19日
プロが考える商標の効果的な活用方法～商標は言葉の独占？【リライト版】
そういう前提で、議論が交わされています。
商標を認知してもらったほうがいいのです。
①に関して、これが最も残念な活用方法です。
強要罪のおそれすらある行為です。
商標の機能を失うおそれもあります。
（繰り返しますが、商標としての「使用」はダメです。）
一つの考え方ですが、ご参考になれば幸いです。
本記事がいいなと感じたら「シェア」や「いいね！」をお願いします！
「シェア」「Tweet」「いいね！」ボタンは一番下にあります。
スマホの方は、青字に白の「鳥」や「ｆ」ボタンを押してください！
当ブログのサイトマップはこちら！
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
【ＰＲ】個人様・社長様に特化＆元特許審査官が運営する特許事務所！
「おすすめの特許事務所」「おすすめの弁理士」を目指します！
そんな東雲特許事務所（しののめ特許事務所）へのお問い合わせは、
お気軽にこちらからどうぞ！
https://www.patande.com/お問い合わせ/
（↑お問い合わせフォームが開くだけですのでご安心ください。）
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
東雲特許事務所（しののめ特許事務所）
弁理士 田村誠治（元特許庁審査官）
【東京都港区新橋】【東京都中央区八丁堀】【東京都北区田端】
【稀有な経歴】特許技術者→特許庁審査官→特許事務所運営
【楽しいホームページ】
個人発明家・小規模事業者専門の東雲（しののめ）特許事務所
https://www.patande.com/
【特許ドットコム】
個人・小規模事業者のための特許出願
https://tokkkyo.com/
【実案ドットコム】
個人・小規模事業専門＆元特許審査官による実用新案申請代理
https://www.jitsuan.com/
【商標ドットコム】
信頼・明確・安心の商標登録申請代理＜商標ドットコム＞
https://www.shohyou.com/
【ここだけの情報満載のブログ】
個人発明家向け特許・発明教室～目指せ一攫千金！～
https://www.tokkyoblog.com/
【本音モードのブログ】
弁理士のプライベートブログ～弁理士の視点＆審査官の視点～
https://ameblo.jp/s-tam1104/
【Facebook】
Facebookページで、より密な情報交換の場をご提供します。
https://www.facebook.com/shinonomepat
【note】
noteはじめました！ブログとYouTubeを同時に楽しめます。
https://note.com/tokkyoblog
https://youtu.be/sJgjSOk72i4
音は出ませんのでぜひご覧ください
＜機械翻訳＞
A Professional’s Perspective on Effective Trademark Use: Is a Trademark a Monopoly on Words? [Revised Edition]
Discussions about trademarks often heat up online.
Examples include terms like *shachuhaku* (sleeping in one’s car), *danshari* (decluttering/minimalism), and, a while back, *Amabie*.
✔ Trademarks are often perceived as a "monopoly on expressions or words."
Discussions often proceed based on this premise.
However, many of these arguments appear hollow because that premise is flawed.
In this article, I will explore effective ways to utilize trademarks.
I intend to prioritize clarity over strict legal precision.
■ Reconfirming the Meaning of Trademark "Use"
First, let’s clarify what constitutes the "use" of a trademark.
✔ ① "Use" (*shiyō*) is a specific legal term defined in the Trademark Act (Article 2).
✔ ② Simply writing or speaking the text of a trademark does *not* constitute "use" in the legal sense.
Therefore, in this article, I will refer to ① as "Use" (legal sense) and ② as "using" (general sense).
■ A Professional’s View on Appropriate Trademark Utilization
Consider the relationships between three parties: the trademark, the trademark owner (right holder), and the consumer.
[Consumer] ←①→ [Trademark] ←②→ [Trademark Owner]
① Relationship between the consumer and the trademark
It is crucial for the trademark to be recognized by a large number of consumers.
② Relationship between the trademark and the trademark owner
The connection between the trademark and the owner is crucial.
Trademark owners might be tempted to focus solely on ②.
However, neglecting ① renders the trademark meaningless.
If consumers do not recognize the trademark, it cannot fulfill its function.
A trademark is not about monopolizing "words" or "expressions."
For the sake of the trademark owner, the trademark should be "used" widely by others.
It is better for the trademark to be recognized.
■ An Unfortunate Way to Utilize Trademarks
When a trademark owner tells consumers "Do not use" the trademark!
Regarding ①, this is the most unfortunate way to utilize a trademark. As mentioned above, failing to allow the trademark to be recognized is problematic.
After all, there is no legal basis for demanding that others "not use" it.
Such a demand could even potentially constitute the crime of coercion.
However, completely ignoring how consumers "use" the trademark is also risky.
If the link to the trademark is severed (i.e., if it loses its association with the source), it risks becoming a "generic term."
It could lose its function as a trademark altogether.
■ How to utilize the trademark while balancing ① and ②
Ideally, you want to balance ① and ②.
How can this be achieved?
You should allow consumers to "use" the trademark in a natural way.
For example, let them "use" it in blogs or on YouTube.
(To reiterate, however, "use" *as* a trademark—implying it is their own brand—is not permitted.)
In doing so, you might encourage them to include a statement such as:
"This is a registered trademark of [Name/Company]."
Those who "use" the trademark should also proactively include such statements.
Looking around, many registered trademarks are utilized in this manner.
This is just one perspective, but I hope it proves helpful.
