2025年04月14日
時代に逆行する発明の進歩性について～ブーム再来を狙う【リライト版】
すぐ思いつくのは、壊れにくさ、通信時間、通信エリア等でしょうか。
時代に逆行するものは特許を取れないようにも聞こえます。
✓従来のものから容易に発明できないこと
✓従来のものとの違いが大きいこと
例えば、「非容易性」などがより直観的なのかも知れません。
✓そのトランシーバーが、従来の機器から容易に発明できない！
そうであれば、特許を取ることはできます。
トランシーバーが時代に逆行したものであるとしてもです。
＝時代に逆行していないと言ってもいいでしょう。
✓ブーム再来！なんてこともよくあることです。
ブームを作ることができれば、より理想ですね。
昔からあるものは、それだけ従来の発明が多いということです。
その分、発明の進歩性が認められる可能性が低いとも言えます。
ただ「そんなトランシーバーは、当時みんなが考えていたよ」
この程度で、証拠がないのであれば、発明の進歩性は否定されません。
＜お知らせ＞
本記事がいいなと感じたら「シェア」や「いいね！」をお願いします！
「シェア」「Tweet」「いいね！」ボタンは一番下にあります。
スマホの方は、青字に白の「鳥」や「ｆ」ボタンを押してください！
当ブログのサイトマップはこちら！
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
【ＰＲ】個人様・社長様に特化＆元特許審査官が運営する特許事務所！
「おすすめの特許事務所」「おすすめの弁理士」を目指します！
そんな東雲特許事務所（しののめ特許事務所）へのお問い合わせは、
お気軽にこちらからどうぞ！
https://www.patande.com/お問い合わせ/
（↑お問い合わせフォームが開くだけですのでご安心ください。）
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
東雲特許事務所（しののめ特許事務所）
弁理士 田村誠治（元特許庁審査官）
【東京都港区新橋】【東京都中央区八丁堀】【東京都北区田端】
【稀有な経歴】特許技術者→特許庁審査官→特許事務所運営
【楽しいホームページ】
個人発明家・小規模事業者専門の東雲（しののめ）特許事務所
https://www.patande.com/
【特許ドットコム】
個人・小規模事業者のための特許出願
https://tokkkyo.com/
【実案ドットコム】
個人・小規模事業専門＆元特許審査官による実用新案申請代理
https://www.jitsuan.com/
【商標ドットコム】
信頼・明確・安心の商標登録申請代理＜商標ドットコム＞
https://www.shohyou.com/
【ここだけの情報満載のブログ】
個人発明家向け特許・発明教室～目指せ一攫千金！～
https://www.tokkyoblog.com/
【本音モードのブログ】
弁理士のプライベートブログ～弁理士の視点＆審査官の視点～
https://ameblo.jp/s-tam1104/
【Facebook】
Facebookページで、より密な情報交換の場をご提供します。
https://www.facebook.com/shinonomepat
【note】
noteはじめました！ブログとYouTubeを同時に楽しめます。
https://note.com/tokkyoblog
https://youtu.be/sJgjSOk72i4
音は出ませんのでぜひご覧ください
＜機械翻訳＞
On the progressiveness of inventions that go against the times - aiming for a resurgence of the boom [Rewritten version]
I saw a video ad for walkie-talkies on YouTube.
I couldn't help but watch it.
Walkie-talkies are cool!
If you think about it, if you just want to communicate, a smartphone is enough.
The difference between a smartphone and a walkie-talkie is...
The things that immediately come to mind are durability, communication time, and communication area.
But would that make you want to buy a walkie-talkie again?
In this sense, walkie-talkies can be said to go against the times.
But the walkie-talkies in the video ad are cool.
Before I thought about whether I would actually use one, I felt like I wanted one.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks the same way.
And that's why the products are sold and the video ads are aired.
So there's a demand for things that go against the times.
If that's the case, it seems worth protecting with a patent.
●About the patentability of inventions that go against the times
One of the requirements for an invention to be patented is the "inventive step of the invention."
When you hear "progress," you think of "progress in the times."
It sounds like something that goes against the times cannot be patented.
But that's not the case.
●What is the inventive step of an invention?
Under the Patent Act, the "inventive step of an invention" is
✓It cannot be easily invented from conventional things
✓It is significantly different from conventional things
The expression "inventive step" may not be appropriate.
For example, "non-ease" may be more intuitive.
In other words, whether something goes against the times or not has nothing to do with patents.
Even if an invention goes against the times, you can get a patent.
In the example of a walkie-talkie,
✓That walkie-talkie cannot be easily invented from conventional equipment!
If that's the case, you can get a patent.
Even if the walkie-talkie is something that goes against the times.
On the contrary, a transceiver that can be patented (has inventive step)
is not going against the times.
●Can we aim for a resurgence of the boom?
This is not limited to the example of transceivers, but
✓ A resurgence of the boom! is a common occurrence.
It would be nice to find something like that first and aim for a patent.
Or, conversely, get a patent and boost your business!
It would be even better if you could create a boom.
It would be nice to aim for a resurgence of the boom!
However, there is something to be careful of.
The more things that have been around for a long time, the more traditional inventions there are.
This means that the more unlikely it is that the invention will be recognized as inventive.
However, if there is no evidence other than "everyone was thinking of such a transceiver at the time," the invention's inventive step will not be denied.
I hope this will be helpful when discovering ideas.
