2024年01月18日
永久機関の発明を弁理士（特許事務所）はどう扱うか？【リライト版】
そして「なぜ永久機関として成立しないのか？」
こんな説明をするという観点からまとめられていました。
多くの人が永久機関に興味あることがうかがえます。
「なぜ永久機関として成立しないのか？」
このことがすぐに判断できない場合もあることでしょう。
弊所：東雲特許事務所（しののめ特許事務所）の例でご説明します。
＜目次＞
そうお伝えするだけなら簡単です。
例えば、エネルギー効率の良い機関であることが考えられます。
永久機関ではないにしても、発明は成立するかも知れません。
永久機関っぽいものを発明するのも楽しいものです！
もちろん、一般的な発明でも同じことです。
そのうえで、特許を出すかをいっしょに議論しましょう。
→書類には「永久機関である」のような断定的な記載はしません。
→審査官はその発明をどのように審査するでしょうか？
永久機関かどうか、すぐに判断できない場合、どう扱うでしょうか？
＜お知らせ＞
本記事がいいなと感じたら「シェア」や「いいね！」をお願いします！
「シェア」「Tweet」「いいね！」ボタンは一番下にあります。
スマホの方は、青字に白の「鳥」や「ｆ」ボタンを押してください！
当ブログのサイトマップはこちら！
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
【ＰＲ】個人様・社長様に特化＆元特許審査官が運営する特許事務所！
「おすすめの特許事務所」「おすすめの弁理士」を目指します！
そんな東雲特許事務所（しののめ特許事務所）へのお問い合わせは、
お気軽にこちらからどうぞ！
https://www.patande.com/お問い合わせ/
（↑お問い合わせフォームが開くだけですのでご安心ください。）
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
東雲特許事務所（しののめ特許事務所）
弁理士 田村誠治（元特許庁審査官）
【東京都港区新橋】【東京都中央区八丁堀】【東京都北区田端】
【稀有な経歴】特許技術者→特許庁審査官→特許事務所運営
【楽しいホームページ】
個人発明家・小規模事業者専門の東雲（しののめ）特許事務所
https://www.patande.com/
【特許ドットコム】
個人・小規模事業者のための特許出願
https://tokkkyo.com/
【実案ドットコム】
個人・小規模事業専門＆元特許審査官による実用新案申請代理
https://www.jitsuan.com/
【商標ドットコム】
信頼・明確・安心の商標登録申請代理＜商標ドットコム＞
https://www.shohyou.com/
【ここだけの情報満載のブログ】
個人発明家向け特許・発明教室～目指せ一攫千金！～
https://www.tokkyoblog.com/
【本音モードのブログ】
弁理士のプライベートブログ～弁理士の視点＆審査官の視点～
https://ameblo.jp/s-tam1104/
【Facebook】
Facebookページで、より密な情報交換の場をご提供します。
https://www.facebook.com/shinonomepat
【note】
noteはじめました！ブログとYouTubeを同時に楽しめます。
https://note.com/tokkyoblog
https://youtu.be/sJgjSOk72i4
音は出ませんのでぜひご覧ください
＜機械翻訳＞
How should a patent attorney (patent office) handle the invention of a perpetual motion machine? [Rewritten version]
I learned more about technology from YouTube.
After all, the explanation in the video is easy to understand! It's a good time.
The other day, I learned about perpetual motion machines.
One video about perpetual motion motion was very interesting.
At first glance, they were introducing something that looked like a perpetual motion machine.
And "Why is it not established as a perpetual motion machine?"
It was compiled from the perspective of providing this explanation.
It was also very meaningful to review thermodynamics.
The number of views is also quite high.
It seems that many people are interested in perpetual motion machines.
Therefore, in this article, we will touch on perpetual motion machines from the perspective of patents.
Let's say you receive a request to say, "I've invented a perpetual motion machine!"
“Why isn’t it established as a perpetual motion machine?”
There may be times when this cannot be determined immediately.
How should a patent attorney (patent office) handle such a case?
I will explain using the example of our firm: Shinonome Patent Office (Shinonome Patent Office).
<Table of contents>
(1) We will not immediately refuse your request.
(2) Even if it is not a perpetual motion machine, there is a possibility of an energy efficient machine.
(3) We will inform the customer of all circumstances and discuss them together.
■(1) We will not immediately decline your request.
"A perpetual motion machine is scientifically impossible!"
It's easy if you just tell me that.
However, I have no dreams or hopes for such a refusal!
I believe that questioning common sense is one of the important tasks of a patent attorney.
First, we seriously listen to the customer's theory.
■(2) Even if it is not a perpetual motion machine, there is a possibility of an energy efficient machine.
If it really was a perpetual motion machine, it would be a great patent.
However, patents are not limited to perpetual motion machines (of course).
Even if it is not a perpetual motion machine, it will be patented as a normal invention.
For example, it could be an energy-efficient engine.
Specifically, for example,
✔ Utilize nature (gravity, sun, ocean, etc.)
✔ Utilize energy that is overlooked (e.g. the power of people passing through station ticket gates)
Even if it is not a perpetual motion machine, the invention may be successful.
It's fun to invent something that resembles a perpetual motion machine!
■(3) We will inform the customer of all circumstances and discuss them together.
After obtaining a patent, it is up to the inventor how to utilize the patent.
This point is the same for perpetual motion machines and anything that resembles a perpetual motion machine.
Of course, the same is true for general inventions.
We will inform our customers of all these circumstances.
After that, let's discuss together whether to issue a patent.
■Supplementary information
What did you think?
✔When we issue a patent for a perpetual motion machine invention (according to the customer)
→Documents do not contain conclusive statements such as "it is a perpetual motion machine."
✔If you are an individual inventor and issue a patent for your own "perpetual motion machine" invention
→How will the examiner examine the invention?
If you cannot immediately determine whether or not it is a perpetual motion machine, how should you handle it?
For more information on this, please see this article.
(I have expressed some ideas based on my experience as an examiner)
About perpetual motion machines and patents
About perpetual motion machines and patents [Rewritten version]
