2023年11月30日
永久機関と特許について【リライト版】
以下のような感じで、過去記事のリライトをしていきます。
①特許・商標・著作権など知的財産権の記事
②できるだけ１文１行（PC表示、１行32文字）でリライトする
③YouTubeの台本として用い、YouTubeにもアップする
④YouTubeでアクセス数の多い動画の内容から、リライトする
今年の初めにやるぞと決めたのですが、やっと着手！
年内にできただけセーフです（笑）
あなたも今年のやり残しに着手してスッキリしましょう！
今日はYouTubeで最もアクセスの多いこちらの記事です。
「永久機関と特許について」
過去記事のリンクはこちらです。
（ここから上は削除するかも知れません。あるいは別記事に移動）
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
＜永久機関と特許について＞
特許審査官的な視点を交えつつ、考えてみたいと思います。
果たして、永久機関は特許になるのか？
自然法則に反するけれども、機関の構成をあれこれいじってみたら…
そのうちに、なんだか永久機関っぽくなっちゃった！
そんな感じのものです。
ただこれは、永久機関ではありません。
これをより複雑にしたのが、なんちゃって永久機関の一態様です。
どこか機関の一部に、自然法則に反する部分があります。
そう思っても、実際はどこか間違っている可能性があります。
できれば、試作品を作ってみて、たしかめてみましょう。
（特許分類：特許を分類したインデックス）
（特許の専門家：特許審査官、弁理士など）
その場合には、十分に説明して、特許を拒絶するのでしょうね。
そんなこともあるかも知れません。
✔たとえそのような機関が特許になったとしても、あまり意味はない
しかし、その機関が、実社会において何ら役に立たなければ…
特許の意味はあまりないでしょう。
①諸事情で、ただちに依頼を断ることもあると思います。
②じっくり説明を聞いて、依頼を受けることもあります。
例：効率的なエネルギー出力装置、エネルギー変換装置などです。
そのうえで、アイデアとして成立しないなら、依頼を受けません。
アイデアとして成立するなら、依頼を受けます。
ただ「永久機関っぽい」発明は、考えるのが楽しいです。
例えば、こんなのはどうでしょうか？
✔機関の一部に、自然エネルギーを使う
自然のエネルギー：太陽光、波の力、季節の寒暖差などなど
多くのエネルギーを出力できる可能性もあります。
✔検討や説明には、多大な時間を使うこともあるでしょう
しかし、楽しいからいいんじゃないかな、という感じです。
そんなときには、ぜひ弊所までお知らせください。
じっくり議論しましょう。
そして、最善のオーダーメイドの特許戦略をご提案したいと思います。
本記事がいいなと感じたら「シェア」や「いいね！」をお願いします！
「シェア」「Tweet」「いいね！」ボタンは一番下にあります。
スマホの方は、青字に白の「鳥」や「ｆ」ボタンを押してください！
当ブログのサイトマップはこちら！
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
【ＰＲ】個人様・社長様に特化＆元特許審査官が運営する特許事務所！
「おすすめの特許事務所」「おすすめの弁理士」を目指します！
そんな東雲特許事務所（しののめ特許事務所）へのお問い合わせは、
お気軽にこちらからどうぞ！
https://www.patande.com/お問い合わせ/
（↑お問い合わせフォームが開くだけですのでご安心ください。）
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
東雲特許事務所（しののめ特許事務所）
弁理士 田村誠治（元特許庁審査官）
【東京都港区新橋】【東京都中央区八丁堀】【東京都北区田端】
【稀有な経歴】特許技術者→特許庁審査官→特許事務所運営
【楽しいホームページ】
個人発明家・小規模事業者専門の東雲（しののめ）特許事務所
https://www.patande.com/
【特許ドットコム】
個人・小規模事業者のための特許出願
https://tokkkyo.com/
【実案ドットコム】
個人・小規模事業専門＆元特許審査官による実用新案申請代理
https://www.jitsuan.com/
【商標ドットコム】
信頼・明確・安心の商標登録申請代理＜商標ドットコム＞
https://www.shohyou.com/
【ここだけの情報満載のブログ】
個人発明家向け特許・発明教室～目指せ一攫千金！～
https://www.tokkyoblog.com/
【本音モードのブログ】
弁理士のプライベートブログ～弁理士の視点＆審査官の視点～
https://ameblo.jp/s-tam1104/
【Facebook】
Facebookページで、より密な情報交換の場をご提供します。
https://www.facebook.com/shinonomepat
【note】
noteはじめました！ブログとYouTubeを同時に楽しめます。
https://note.com/tokkyoblog
https://youtu.be/sJgjSOk72i4
音は出ませんのでぜひご覧ください
＜機械翻訳＞
About perpetual motion machines and patents [Rewritten version]
I have finally started rewriting the past articles on this blog (lol)
I will rewrite the previous article as follows.
① Articles on intellectual property rights such as patents, trademarks, and copyrights
② Rewrite each sentence per line (PC display, 32 characters per line) as much as possible.
③Use it as a YouTube script and upload it to YouTube as well.
④Rewrite the content of the most accessed videos on YouTube
I decided to do it at the beginning of this year, and I finally got around to it!
It's safe as long as you can do it within the year (lol)
Let's get started on this year's unfinished business and feel refreshed!
This is the most accessed article on YouTube today.
"About perpetual motion machines and patents"
Click here for links to past articles.
(I may delete the above from here. Or move to another article)
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
<About perpetual motion machines and patents>
For a certain number of inventors, a perpetual motion machine is a dream invention.
In this article, I will talk about perpetual motion machines and patents.
I would like to think about this from the perspective of a patent examiner.
Will a perpetual motion machine be patented?
For those who are thinking about such things, this will give you some hints.
(1) About the true nature of perpetual motion machines
One form of perpetual motion machine is one that goes against the laws of nature.
Although it goes against the laws of nature, if you play around with the structure of the engine...
Eventually, it started to look like a perpetual motion machine!
It's like that.
However, this is not a perpetual motion machine.
So why did it become such a perpetual motion machine?
Below is one way to think about it.
Do you know about the "1=2 proof"?
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
Let b=a.
Adding a to both sides, a+b=2a
Subtracting 2b from both sides gives a-b=2a-2b
(a-b)=2(a-b)
Divide both sides by (a-b): 1=2
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
This proof and conclusion are wrong.
However, it is becoming difficult to understand what is wrong.
What made this even more complicated was a type of perpetual motion machine.
There is some part of the institution that violates the laws of nature.
However, it is difficult to point out that part.
<Summary of (1)>
Invented a perpetual motion machine!
Even if you think so, there may actually be something wrong.
Sufficient verification is required.
Is it really a perpetual motion machine? Can it be in perpetual motion?
If possible, try making a prototype and check it out.
(2) Regarding patent applications for perpetual motion machines
There are quite a number of patent applications for perpetual motion machines.
There are also patent classifications for "perpetual motion" and "perpetual motion."
(Patent classification: index that categorizes patents)
However, sometimes it is difficult to point out areas that violate the laws of nature.
So how do patent experts treat perpetual motion machines?
(Patent experts: patent examiners, patent attorneys, etc.)
●Patent examiner
There are examiners who specialize in perpetual motion machines.
It may be difficult to point out where something violates the laws of nature.
In that case, the patent would probably be refused with a thorough explanation.
Or patent it as "just a machine that is not a perpetual motion machine"!
That may be the case.
The important thing here is that
✔Even if such an institution were granted a patent, it would not be of much significance.
The inventor may feel that his perpetual motion machine has been recognized.
However, if that institution is of no use in the real world...
Patents probably don't mean much.
●Patent attorney
If you receive a request for an invention that looks like a perpetual motion machine,
①Due to various circumstances, we may refuse your request immediately.
② After listening carefully to the explanation, we may accept your request.
Although it cannot be called a perpetual motion machine, it is a case where the idea is viable.
Examples: efficient energy output devices, energy conversion devices, etc.
(3) About our firm: Shinonome Patent Office
At our office, we will not immediately decline a request for a perpetual motion machine.
We will listen to the explanation and consider whether there is any part of it that can be realized as an idea.
Then, if the idea doesn't work, we won't accept the request.
If the idea is viable, we will accept the request.
In any case, we will thoroughly consider the matter and provide you with a thorough explanation.
Personally, I am negative about the perpetual motion machine itself.
However, it is fun to think about inventions that are similar to a perpetual motion machine.
For example, how about something like this?
✔Use natural energy for some parts of the engine
Natural energy: sunlight, wave power, seasonal temperature differences, etc.
✔ Gain energy little by little (unknowingly) from many people
It also has the potential to output a lot of energy.
When we receive a request regarding perpetual motion,
✔It may take a lot of time to consider and explain.
✔Even if you receive consideration fees and consultation fees, it may not be worth it.
However, I feel like it's okay because it's fun.
If you come up with an invention of a perpetual motion machine (ish?)!
In such a case, please let us know.
Let's discuss it carefully.
We would also like to propose the best custom-made patent strategy.
